I wonder if the best algorithm for these programs wouldn't be, instead of sequentially stacking the images, to stack adjacent pairs, then pairs of pairs, etc. The only penalty, aside from the extra work involved, seems to be perhaps excessive sharpness in finely detailed, high-contrast areas. Voila! Much better results! A pair of images for comparison have been attached (FOV is about 1 cm). I got frustrated with poor results from a gemmy weloganite micro, taken in 50 images, so I tried re-stacking this into 5 sets of 10 each, then combining the 5 resulting images (all tiffs to avoid jpeg "round-off" error). It's especially acute for deep images with many pictures in the stack. Recent Images in DiscussionsĢ8th Mar 2008 21:25 UTC Tony Peterson Expert This isn't exactly about CombineZ vs Helicon but is appropriate to the thread.in addition to the halo problem - which can't be avoided when a close object sits in front of a distant background - I sometimes have a problem with CombineZM not producing a well-focussed image of the terminations of objects that project outward, particularly if they are low-contrast. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area. Hugin is a powerful image merging tool that also does focus stacking, though with TIFF rather than NEF. will ideally work with NEF files (Nikon Raws) I think you can do it in PS but I only have elements 9 which I am pretty sure wont focus stack.
best merged with a specialized software, such as TuFuse, Helicon Focus or CombineZM. Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area. Are there any free programs for Focus Stacking, which. Focus stacking is similar to High Dynamic Range (HDR) photography. Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area. Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area. Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area. ╳Discussions 💬 Home 🔎 Search 📅 Latest Groups EducationOpen discussion area.
0 kommentar(er)
